Capítulo 6. Cibersemiótica: un nuevo fundamento para una teoría interdisciplinar de la información, la cognición, la comunicación significativa y la interacción entre la naturaleza y la cultura

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52495/c6.emcs.17.ei13

Palabras clave:

Cibersemiótica, comunicación, significación, cognición, información

Resumen

El presente capítulo aborda de manera sintética las bases conceptuales de la cibersemiótica. La cibersemiótica es una propuesta conceptual que propone un marco no reduccionista para integrar el conocimiento de la tercera persona de las ciencias exactas y las ciencias de la vida con el conocimiento de la primera persona descrito como las cualidades del sentimiento en las humanidades y el conocimiento intersubjetivo de la segunda persona de las interacciones lingüísticas comunicativas parciales sobre las que se basan los aspectos sociales y culturales de la realidad. Desde esta perspectiva conceptual se sugiere que el conocimiento se desarrolla en cuatro aspectos de la realidad humana: nuestro entorno natural descrito por las ciencias naturales físicas y químicas; nuestra corporalidad descrita por las ciencias de la vida como la biología y la medicina; nuestro mundo interno de experiencias subjetivas descritas por investigaciones fundamentadas fenomenológicamente y, nuestro mundo social descrito por las ciencias sociales. Llamo a este modelo alternativo a la jerarquía positivista la estrella cibersemiótica. Este capítulo explica entonces el nuevo entendimiento de la Wissenschaft [ciencia] que emerge de las concepciones de Peirce y Luhmann.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Apel, K.-O. (1981.). Charles S. Peirce: From pragmatism to pragmaticism, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

Arrabales, R., Ledezma, A. & Sanchis, A. (2010). ConsScale: A pragmatic scale for measuring the level of consciousness in artificial agents. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17(3-4), 131-164.

Baer, W. (2010). Introduction to the Physics of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies,17(3-4), 165-191.

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution and epistemology. St. Albans: Paladin.

Barbieri, M. (2001). The organic codes: The birth of semantic biology, Ancona: PeQuod. Republished in 2003 as The organic codes. An introduction to semantic biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barbieri, M. (2006). Life and semiosis: The real nature of information and meaning, Semiotica, 158(1/4), 233-254.

Barbieri, M. (2008). Biosemiotics: A new understanding of life. Naturwissenschaften, 95, 577-599.

Barbieri, M. (2011). Origin and evolution of the brain. Biosemiotics, 4, 369-399.

Barrow, J. D. (2007). New Theories of Everything, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bhaskar, R. A., (1997 [1975]). A realist theory of science. London: Verso.

Bhaskar, R. A., (1998 [1979]). The possibility of naturalism (3rd edition). London: Routledge.

Boler, J.F. (1963). Charles Peirce and scholastic realism: A study of Peirce’s relation to John Duns Scotus. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Bourdieu, P. L. & Wacquant, J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Brandom, R. B. (1994). Making it explicit. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Brent, Joseph L. (1998). Charles Sanders Peirce: A life (Revised and enlarged edition). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Brier, S. (1980). Der ønskes analyseret (evt. v.h.a. egne undersøgelser), om hierarki- og sandsynlighedsbetragtninger i beskrivelsen af adfærd kan anvendes i —og udbygge— een eller flere motivationspsykologiske teorier eller modeller. (University Prize Essay in psychology about the fruitfulness of hierarchy —and probability— deliberations in constructing models of motivation from behavioral analysis. Awarded with the Gold Medal in psychology by Copenhagen University).

Brier, S. (1999). Biosemiotics and the foundation of cybersemiotics. Reconceptualizing the insights of ethology, second order cybernetics and Peirce’s semiotics in biosemiotics to create a non-Cartesian information science. Semiotica, 127(1/4), 169-198.

Brier, S. (2000a). Biosemiotic as a possible bridge between embodiment in cognitive semantics and the motivation concept of animal cognition in ethology. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 7(1), 57-75.

Brier, S. (2000b).Transdisciplinary frameworks of knowledge. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17(5), 433-458.

_(2001). Cybersemiotics and Umweltslehre. Semiotica, 134(1/4), 779-814.

_(2006). Informationsvidenskabsteori (2nd edition), Forlaget Samfundslitteratur. (Translated titel: Philosophy of information sciences, under revision).

_(2007). Applying Luhmann’s system theory as part of a transdisciplinary frame for communication science. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 14(2-3), 29-65.

_(2008a). Cybersemiotics: Why information is not enough. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Brier, S. (2008b). The paradigm of Peircean biosemiotics. Signs, 2, 20-81.

_(2008c). Bateson and Peirce on the pattern that connects and the sacred. In J. Hoffmeyer (Ed.) (2008). A legacy for living systems: Gregory Bateson as a precursor for biosemiotic thinking (pp. 229-255). London: Springer.

_(2008d). A Peircean panentheist scientific mysticism. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 27, 20-45.

_(2009a). Cybersemiotic pragmaticism and constructivism. Constructivist Foundations, 5(1), 19-38.

_(2009b). Levels of cybersemiotics: Possible ontologies of signification. Cognitive Semiotics, 4, 28-62.

_(2010). Cybersemiotics and the question of knowledge. In G. Dodig-Crnkovic & M. Burgin (Eds.). Information and computation (pp. 1-36). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

_(2011). Ethology and the Sebeokian way from zoosemiotics to cyber(bio)semiotics. In J. Deely, K. Kull. & S. Petrilli (Eds.). Semiotics continues to astonish: The intellectual heritage of Thomas Albert Sebeok (pp. 41-84). Paris: Mouton de Gruyter.

Carr, B. (2007) (Ed.). Universe or multiverse? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

Colapietro, V. (1989). Peirce’s approach to the self: A semiotic perspective on human subjectivity. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Cobley, P. (2010a). Second-order thinking, first-class reasoning. Review of Brier (2008) Cybersemiotics: Why information is not Enough! Signs, 3, 69-107.

Cobley, P. (2010b). Cybersemiotics and human modelling. Entropy, 12, 2045-2066.

Cobley, P., Deely, J., Kull K. & Petrilli, S. (Eds.) (2011). Semiotics continues to astonish: Thomas A. Sebeok and the doctrine of signs. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Corrington, R. (1993). An introduction in C.S. Peirce: Philosopher, semiotician, and ecstatic naturalist. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam Publishing.

Deledalle, G. (2000). Charles Peirce’s philosophy of signs: Essays in comparative semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Back Bay Books.

Descola, P. 1996. Constructing natures: Symbolic ecology and social practice. In P. Descola & G. Pálsson (Eds.). Nature and society: Anthropological perspectives (pp. 82–102). New York: Routledge.

Dodig-Crnkovic, G. (2010). The cybersemiotics and info-computationalist research programmes as platforms for knowledge production in organisms and machines. Entropy, 12(4), 878-901.

Dodig-Crnkovic. G. & Müller, V. (2011). A dialogue concerning two world systems: Info- Computational vs. mechanistic. In G. Dodig-Crnkovic & M. Burgin (Eds.). Information and computation nets (pp. 149-184). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

Diamond, J. 2005. Collapse. How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking.

Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare. The evolution of human evolution. New York: Norton.

Eigen, M., et al. (1981). The origin of genetic information, Scientific American, April, 78-94.

Durst-Andersen, P. (2011). Linguistic supertypes: A cognitive-semiotic theory of human communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

El-Hani, C.N. (Ed.) (2008): Emergence and downward determination. Special issue of Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 15(3-4).

Emmeche, C. (1998). Defining life as a semiotic phenomenon. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 5(1), 33-42.

Emmeche, C. (2004). A-life, organism and body: The semiotics of emergent levels. In M. Bedeau, P. Husbands, T. Hutton, S. Kumar, & H. Suzuki (Eds.). Workshop and Tutorial Proceedings. Ninth International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems (Alife IX, pp. 117-124). Boston Massachusetts, September 12th, 2004.

Esposito, J.L. (1980). Evolutionary metaphysics: The development of Peirce’s theory of the categories. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.

Favareau, D. (Ed.) (2010). Essential writings of biosemiotics. New York: Springer.

Fink, H. (2006). Three sorts of naturalism. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(2), 202-221.

Fisch, M.H. (1986). Peirce, semeiotic, and pragmatism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Floridi, L. (2004). Informational realism. Research and Practise in Information Technology, 37, 7-12.

Floridi, L. (2009). Against digital ontology, Synthese, 168(1), 151-178.

Foerster, H. von (1988). On constructing a reality. Stroudberg: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.

Furusawa, A. & van Loock. P. (2011). Quantum teleportation and entanglement: A hybrid approach to optical quantum information processing. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.

Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.). New York: Crossroad.

Esbjörn-Hargens, S. & Zimmerman. M. E. (2009). Integral ecology: Uniting multiple perspectives on the natural world. Boston: Integral Books.

Habermas, J. (1987). Knowledge and human interest. New York: Polity Press.

Haikonen, P.O.A. (2008). Conscious machines. Charlottesville: Imprint Academic.

Haikonen P.O.A. (2009). Qualia and conscious machines. International Journal of Machine Consciousness, 1(2), 225 – 234.

Haack, S. (1992). Extreme scholastic realism. Its relevance to philosophy of science today. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, XXVIII(1), 22-23.

Marwin, H. (1991 [1977]). Cannibals and kings: Origins of cultures. New York: Vintage.

Hoffmeyer, J. (1996). Signs of meaning in the universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Hoffmeyer, J. (2008). Biosemiotics. Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press.

Hoffmeyer, J. & Emmeche C. (1991). Code-duality and the semiotics of nature. In M. Anderson & F. Merrell (Eds.). On semiotic modeling (pp. 117–166). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Hookway, C. (1992). Peirce. London: Routledge.

Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European science and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Husserl, E. (1997). Fænomenologiens ide (Die Idee der Phenomenologie). København: Hans Reitzels forlag.

Husserl, E. (1999). Cartesianske Meditationer (Cartesianische Meditationen). København: Hans Reitzels forlag.

Kim, J. (2006). Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Krampen, M. (1981). Phytosemiotics. Semiotica, 36(3/4), 187–209.

Kull, K., Deacon, T., Deacon, Emmeche, C., Hoffmeyer, J., Stjernfelt, F. (2010). Theses on biosemiotics: Prolegomena to a theoretical biology. Biological Theory, 4(2) 2009, 167–173.

Kultgen, J.K. (1959-1960). The «future metaphysics» of Peirce and Whitehead. Kant-Studien, 5, 285-293.

Küppers, B. O. (1990). Information and the origin of life. Cambridge,: The MIT Press.

Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy, New York: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

Laughlin, R.B. (2005). A different universe: Reinventing physics from the bottom down. New York: Basic Books.

Liszka, J.J. (1996): A general introduction to the semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Lorenz, K. (1970-1971). Studies in animal and human behaviour I and II. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on self-reference. New York: Colombia University Press.

Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Maturana, H. (1981). Autopoiesis. In M. Zeleney (Ed.), Autopoiesis: A theory of living organization. New York: North Holland.

Maturana, H. (1983). What is it to see? Archivos de Biologia y Medicina Experimentales, 16, 255-269.

Maturana, H.R. (1988a). Ontology of observing: The biological foundation of self consciousness and the physical domain of existence. Irish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 25-82.

Maturana, H. (1988b). Reality: The search for objectivity, or the quest for a compelling argument. Irish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 25-82.

Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. London: Reidel.

Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1986). Tree of knowledge: Biological Roots of human understanding. London: Shambhala Publishers.

McDowell, J. (1998). Mind, value and reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

McGinn, C. (2000). The mysterious flame: Conscious minds in a material world. London: Basic Books.

Menand, L. (2001). The metaphysical club: A story of ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962 [1945]). Phenomenology of perception, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Monod, J. (1971). Chance and necessity: An essay on the natural philosophy of modern biology. New York: Vintage.

Murphey, M (1961). The development of Peirce’s philosophy. London: Oxford University Press.

Nöth, W. (2001). Protosemiosics and physicosemiosis. Sign System Studies, 29(1), 13-26.

Nöth, W. (2002). Semiotic machines. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 9(1), 3-22.

Nöth, W. (2009). On the instrumentality and semiotic agency of signs, tools, and intelligent machines. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 17(3-4). 11-36.

Parker, K.A. (1998). The continuity of Peirce’s thought. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

Peirce, C.S. (1931-1935). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Intelex CD-ROM edition (1994), reproducing Vols. I-VI, Hartshorne, C. & Weiss, P. (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1931-1935; Vols. VII-VIII, Burks, A.W. (Ed.) same publisher, 1958. Citations give volume and paragraph number, separated by a period.

Penrose, R. (1990). The emperor’s new mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Popper, K.R., and Eccles, J. C. (1977). The self and its brain. Berlin: Springer.

Prigogine, I. (1996). The end of certainty. Time, chaos, and the new laws of nature. New York: Free Press.

Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam Books.

Rappaport, Roy (1984 [1968]). Pigs for the ancestors: Ritual in the ecology of a New Guinea people. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Rasch, W. (2012). Luhmann’s ontology, Revue internationale de philosophie, 259(1), 85-106.

Rugh, S.E. and Zinkernagel, H. (2009). On the physical basis of cosmic time. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 40(1), 1-19.

Savan, D. (1987-1988). An Introduction to C.S. Peirce’s full system of semiotic. Toronto: University of Toronto.

Searle, J. (1989): Minds, brains and science. London: Penguin Books.

Saussure, F. de (1969 [1916]). Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Sebeok, T.A. (1965a). Animal communication. Science, 147, 1006–1014.

Sebeok, T.A. (1965b). Coding in animals and man, ETC, 22, 230–249.

Sebeok, T.A. (1976). Contributions to the doctrine of signs. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Sebeok, T.A. (1989). The sign & its masters. New York: University Press of America.

Sebeok, T.A. (1990). Essays in zoosemiotics. Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle.

Sebeok, T.A. 1992. Tell me, where is fancy bred? The biosemiotic self. In T.A. Sebeok & J. Umiker-Sebeok (Eds.) The forms of meaning: Modeling systems theory and semiotic analysis (pp. 333–343). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Sebeok, T.A., Danesi, M. (2000). The forms of meaning: Modeling systems theory and semiotic analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Sebeok, T.A., Umiker-Sebeok, Jean (Eds.) (1992). Biosemiotics: The semiotic web. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Sebeok, T.A. & Danesi. M. (2000). The forms of meanings. Modeling systems theory and semiotic analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Sellers, W. (1991). Science, perception and reality. Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Company.

Short, T.L. (2007). Peirce’s theory of signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stäheli, U. (2012). The hegemony of meaning: Is there an exit to meaning in Niklas Luhmann’s system theory? Revue internationale de philosophie, 259(1), 105-120.

Stapp, H.P. (2007). Mindful universe: Quantum mechanics and the participating observer. Berlin: Springer.

Stengers, I. (2007). Cosmopolitiques II: Mécanique quantique: la fin du rêve. Au nom de la flèche du temps: le défi de Prigogine. La vie et l’artifice: visages de l’émergence. Paris: La Découverte.

Spencer-Brown, G. (1979): Laws of form. New York: Dutton.

Spiegelberg, H. (1965). The phenomenological movement: A historical introduction (2 volumes). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Suskind, L. (2006). The cosmic landscape: String theory and the illusion of intelligent design. New York: Back Bay Books, Little, Brown and Company.

Varela (1975). A calculus for self-reference. International Journal of General Systems, 2, 5-24.

Sonesson, G. (2009). New considerations on the proper study of man – and, marginally, some other animals. Cognitive Semiotics, 4, 34-169.

Tinbergen, N. (1973). The animal in its world (pp. 136-196). London: Allan & Unwin.

Uexküll, J. von (1957 [1934]). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. A picture book of invisible worlds. In C. H. Schiller (Ed.) (1957). Instinctive behavior. The development of a modern concept (pp. 5-80). New York: International Universities Press.

Uexküll, J. von, Geigges, W., Herrmann, J.M. (1993). Endosemiosis, Semiotica, 96(1/2), 5-51.

Uexküll, J. von (1982). The theory of meaning, Semiotica, 42(1), 25-82.

Wheeler , J.A. (1994). At home in the universe. New York: American Institute of Physics.

Wheeler, J.A. (1998). Geons, black holes & quantum foam: A life in physics. New York: Norton.

Whitehead, A.N. (1978). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology. New York: Free Press.

Zlatev, J. (2009a). The semiotic hierarchy: Life, consciousness, signs and language. Cognitive Semiotics, 4, 170-185.

Zlatev, J. (2009b). Levels of meaning, embodiment, and communication. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 16(3-4), 149-174.

Separata correspondiente al capítulo 6

Publicado

2023-07-05

Cómo citar

Brier , S. (2023). Capítulo 6. Cibersemiótica: un nuevo fundamento para una teoría interdisciplinar de la información, la cognición, la comunicación significativa y la interacción entre la naturaleza y la cultura. Espejo De Monografías De Comunicación Social, (17), 177–254. https://doi.org/10.52495/c6.emcs.17.ei13